Not surprisingly, after the first follows the second Hohenberg-Kohn theorem:
Someone tells you: “To me it looks like the 2nd theorem is a natural consequence of the 1st one, and not a separate independent theorem.” Do you agree? Explain the arguments you have to support your opinion in this forum:
Started by: DiogoMz
Started by: Yan_DFT
Started by: Samra Mahmood
Started by: nvrafelg
Started by: Tristancool
Started by: Thomas Saverwyns
Started by: SeanM
Started by: william
Started by: Jakob Vermeulen
Started by: Klaas Luyckx
Started by: Maarten Carrette
Started by: embotter
Started by: Maxim Vermorgen
Started by: inigo
Started by: chuannan
If you want to dig deeper (now or later), you may study this pedagogical lecture by Mel Levy on (mainly) the Hohenberg-Kohn theorems (part of the CECAM school on Teaching the Theory in DFT):
expected time: 20m
report time spent (page code AW03B)