Not surprisingly, after the first follows the second Hohenberg-Kohn theorem:
Someone tells you: “To me it looks like the 2nd theorem is a natural consequence of the 1st one, and not a separate independent theorem.” Do you agree? Explain the arguments you have to support your opinion in this forum:
Started by: Sarang Gosavi
Started by: Yannick
Started by: ruslana.kolesnichenko
Started by: Carlos97
Started by: Thomas
Started by: Zakariya.ar
Started by: Mylo
Started by: Diego De Gusem
Started by: simvdrsn
Started by: laitvo
Started by: dianabarraza2608
Started by: ThibautDhomme
Started by: ARVIND RAJBHAR
Started by: phangels
If you want to dig deeper (now or later), you may study this pedagogical lecture by Mel Levy on (mainly) the Hohenberg-Kohn theorems (part of the CECAM school on Teaching the Theory in DFT):
expected time: 20m
report time spent (page code AW03B)