Not surprisingly, after the first follows the second Hohenberg-Kohn theorem:
Someone tells you: “To me it looks like the 2nd theorem is a natural consequence of the 1st one, and not a separate independent theorem.” Do you agree? Explain the arguments you have to support your opinion in this forum:
Started by: saurish
Started by: carlosjimenez11
Started by: muhammadabbas
Started by: Ing. Mich
Started by: keydson
Started by: Farzaneh
Started by: ajmalrup
Started by: abhoopal
Started by: mbakhsh
Started by: jy12amu
Started by: cm
Started by: thsr
Started by: Arthur Adriaens
Started by: Ine Vanysacker
Started by: Ruben Quiroz
If you want to dig deeper (now or later), you may study this pedagogical lecture by Mel Levy on (mainly) the Hohenberg-Kohn theorems (part of the CECAM school on Teaching the Theory in DFT):
expected time: 20m
report time spent (page code AW03B)