Not surprisingly, after the first follows the second Hohenberg-Kohn theorem:
Someone tells you: “To me it looks like the 2nd theorem is a natural consequence of the 1st one, and not a separate independent theorem.” Do you agree? Explain the arguments you have to support your opinion in this forum:
Started by: R.V.SHIVAKUMAR
Started by: Jonas De Rijck
Started by: Ian Lateur
Started by: Cedric
Started by: ilias.vandevenne
Started by: Tristan Boen
Started by: Luka De Bolle
Started by: Dietger Van den Eynden
Started by: WoutStoffels
If you want to dig deeper (now or later), you may study this pedagogical lecture by Mel Levy on (mainly) the Hohenberg-Kohn theorems (part of the CECAM school on Teaching the Theory in DFT):
expected time: 20m
report time spent (page code AW03B)